Up

The Road to Mastery

By Maureen McHugh  

 

How does one become a master? Whether you aspire to mastery in a martial art, or of musical instrument, or of being comfortable while sitting, it seems reasonable that there should be some common process that underlies all such pursuits.

The first response that comes to mind is practice.

But, on reflection, the idea of simple practice has some limitations.

When you are a beginner, obviously, you don’t know what the master knows. Should you then repeat, everyday, somehow, your “not knowing?” And, as a beginner, usually, one has poorer habits than the master. Should one groove those habits in more deeply?

So, a better response to the question “How to improve” is application. This replaces the idea of rote repetition with an attitude of mindful attentiveness.

            The next question is “How to apply myself?” In the Feldenkrais Method, we address this by systematically pursuing the question: “What difference does it make--if I do “xyz” this way, or if I do “xyz” that way?” We are looking to improve by refining our ability to make distinctions.

This approach, which makes a lot of sense intuitively, is also grounded in scientific research. In the middle of the 19th century pioneering German researchers investigated the question “What level of change in a stimulus can the senses discriminate?”  Taking a look at this research can give us greater depth in our daily “mindful application.”  

How Important is $10?

Before jumping into scientific research, I’ll begin with an example from daily life. Recently I asked a friend a loaded question: “Susan, if you go shopping and see that an item has been discounted $10, how important is that reduction in your decision to buy?”

“It depends on the item,” she said sagely.

“If I am thinking of buying a $20,000 car, $10 doesn’t matter at all. It’s actually insulting to call it a discount. When I am looking at a $60 sweater, $10 off is enticing. It’s not compelling, but it makes me stand and consider a little longer. But when I am eager to own a $20 book, even if I don’t really need it, and the store offers $10 off—well, that’s it! Half price! The book goes with me to the register.”  

Relation to the Science of Perception

Around 1850, Ernst Weber (“vey ber”), a German scientist in the field of human perception, also asked the question “What difference does this amount make?” But he asked it about the experience of touch. He asked a blind man to hold a weight in his hand and notice how heavy it felt. Weber then added a sliver of new weight and asked the man if the weight had changed. At first, the man said, “No. Nothing has happened.” Weber continued adding new slivers until the man said, “Yes. Now the weight has increased.” Weber repeated this experiment starting sometimes with lighter weights and sometimes with heavier ones.

After a large number of trials, Weber found a pattern. When he started the man with a small weight, the man could discern a very small increment of new weight. But when he started him with a large weight, the man could only distinguish a large change. From this Weber concluded that the nervous system, like our shopper, does not pay attention to absolute amounts, but to relative ones.

In everyday life this is comparable to saying that if you are carrying a piano on your back and somebody puts a book on top of the piano, you will not notice the increase in weight. But if you are relaxed and someone touches your arm with a feather, you will feel the new stimulus immediately.

Since Weber’s work was refined by his colleague Gustav Fechner, their combined work is recognized today as the Weber-Fechner Law.  

Applying the Weber-Fechner Law to the Improvement of Movement

In the middle years of the 20th century, Moshe Feldenkrais was looking for guidance in the scientific literature on how to help himself and others improve whatever it is that they do. He noticed that in all situations of “this is not working as I wish,” there is a high level of effort. People in pain are carrying extra tension, and people who feel their performance is not as they wish are usually tense, too.

After reading the work of Weber and Fechner, Feldenkrais directed his attention toward, as a first step, reducing the person’s overall level of tension. He asked his clients to lie down, to do nothing on purpose, to take light movements, and to explore various combinations of movements gently. All this was geared toward creating conditions where the person can discriminate more finely.  

The Proof of the Pudding

Today Feldenkrais Practitioners are bringing the lessons of the past into use for the 21st Century. I have been working this last year with Sarah. At thirty-five she is juggling a full-time career, a family life with young children, and a commitment to regular exercise. In between she makes time for Feldenkrais lessons. Her goals is to untangle some tensions that have plagued her since an athletic injury while a teenager.

Recently, Sarah reported a small epiphany. She was sitting at her computer, where she often spends 10 hours a day.

“A couple days ago I felt this twinge in my neck. The amazing part was that it was so small, and yet I felt it. It wasn’t really a pain, but it was the beginning of one.

 I immediately checked out my feet. They were all cockeyed. So I put them in a more stable position. Then I was more able to easily lift my chest and sit more upright. My shoulders came down immediately. After that the pain in the neck just went away!  And I was able to keep on going.”

Being able to do what you want to do! That’s the payoff of mindful application.